Novel compounds

ABSTRACT

An adjuvant suitable for use with a lipophilic agrochemical has the formula (I), R 1 —(CO) m —O—[—R 2 O—] n —R 3 , wherein R 1  is a C 16  to C 20  straight or branched chain alkyl or alkenyl group, R 2  is ethyl or isopropyl, n is from 8 to 30 and m is 0 or 1 and when R 2  is ethyl, R 3  is a C 1  to C 7  alkyl group and when R 2  is isopropyl, R 3  is hydrogen or a C 1  to C 7  alkyl group, provided that when R 1  is oleyl, R 2  is isopropyl and R 3  is hydrogen, n is not 10. An adjuvant composition comprising an agrochemical and an adjuvant of formula (I) is also claimed. Adjuvants of the invention show effective bioperformance enhancement despite having little or no surfactant properties.

This invention relates to novel compounds and in particular to novel adjuvants and to their use in agrochemical formulations.

A wide variety of adjuvants are available to those skilled in the art for the improvement of the bioperformance of active ingredients such as agrochemicals. In addition to the effect on bioperformance, the physical properties of an adjuvant are of key importance and must be selected with a view to compatibility with the formulation concerned. Thus by way of a single example, it is generally simpler to incorporate a solid adjuvant into a solid formulation such as a water-soluble or water-dispersible granule. In general adjuvants rely on surfactant properties for bioperformance enhancement and one typical class of adjuvants involves an alkyl or aryl group to provide a lipophilic moiety and a (poly)ethoxy chain to provide a hydrophilic moiety. Much has been published on the selection of adjuvants for various purposes and in Hess, F. D. and Foy, C. L., Weed technology, 2000, 14, 807-813 for example it is disclosed that adjuvants for use with lipophilic agrochemical active ingredients are generally of relatively low molecular weight with a degree of ethoxylation which leads to a hydrophile lipophile balance (HLB) of 8 or less. This corresponds to a surfactant with 12 carbon atoms in the lipophilic chain and between 2 and 3 moles of ethoxylate in the hydrophilic portion of the adjuvant. Similarly a surfactant with a longer carbon chain, such as 18 atoms, would have four or less moles of ethoxylate.

Propoxylate groups are considered to be lipophilic. A molecule with a hydrocarbon chain and propoxylate groups would not be considered to have an BLB value and would normally not be considered as a surfactant.

Particular care is required when selecting bioperformance enhancing adjuvants for incorporation in a microencapsulated presentation of an active ingredient, since many conventional ethoxylated adjuvants interfere with the microcapsule wall-forming reaction at the oil/water interface. Use of such adjuvants results in weak or ruptured microcapsules and their presence is therefore undesirable.

In GB 2024626 there is disclosed a range of polypropylene glycol derivatives suitable for destroying mites or ectoparasites and their eggs. In Table 3 there is disclosed propoxylated (10) oleyl alcohol.

We have now found that certain novel alkoxylated long-chain alcohols and acids and end-capped variants thereof, despite having little or no surfactant properties, are unexpectedly effective bioperformance enhancing adjuvants and furthermore have physical properties and attributes that render then particularly effective in certain formulation vehicles.

According to the present invention there is provided an adjuvant having the formula (I) R₁—(CO)_(m)—O—[—R₂O—]_(n)—R₃  (1) wherein R₁ is a C₁₆ to C₂₀ straight or branched chain alkyl or alkenyl group, R₂ is ethyl or isopropyl, n is from 8 to 30 and m is 0 or 1 and when R₂ is ethyl, R₃ is a C₁ to C₇ alkyl group and when R₂ is isopropyl, R₃ is hydrogen or a C₁ to C₇ alkyl group, provided that when R₁ is oleyl, R₂ is isopropyl and R₃ is hydrogen, n is not 10.

According to a further aspect of the present invention there is provided an agrochemical composition comprising a herbicide or fungicide and an adjuvant having the formula (I) R₁—(CO)_(m)—O—[—R₂O—]_(n)—R₃  (I) wherein R₁ is a C₁₆ to C₂₀ straight or branched chain alkyl or alkenyl group, R₂ is ethyl or isopropyl, n is from 8 to 30 and m is 0 or 1 and when R₂ is ethyl, R₃ is a C₁ to C₇ alkyl group and when R₂ is isopropyl, R₃ is hydrogen or a C₁, to C₇ alkyl group.

The agrochemical is preferably a lipophilic herbicide or fungicide.

When R₁ is an alkenyl group it may have one or more double bonds which may be in either cis or trans configuration(s). Preferably R₁ has from 1 to 3 double bonds. It is generally preferred that the double bond(s) are in the cis configuration. It is especially preferred that R₁ is a C₁₈ branched chain alkyl or C₁₈ alkenyl group for example oleyl or isostearyl (derived from the alcohol, 2-hexyl-dodecan-1-ol).

The value of n is preferably from 10 to 30 and especially from 10 to 20. The value of n may be an integer when a specific and uniform number of groups R₂O are introduced or may be an average value when a range of numbers of such groups are introduced.

The value of m is preferably 0.

When R₃ is not hydrogen it is preferably a C₁ , to C₄ alkyl group and in particular methyl or butyl. Butyl is especially preferred. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that an alkyl group R₃ represents an “end cap” to the terminal hydroxyl of the group —O—[—R₂O—]_(n)—H. Since “end capping” a terminal ethylene oxide group (R₂ is ethyl) removes certain undesirable properties (such as the interference with the microencapsulation process) as discussed herein, it is desirable in order to achieve the objects of the invention to “end cap” substantially all of the terminal hydroxyl groups when R₂ is ethyl. Thus R₃ is not hydrogen when R₂ is ethyl. When R₂ is isopropyl on the other hand, R₃ may be hydrogen or alkyl since both moieties achieve the objects of the invention. It is thus possible to “end cap” only a proportion of the terminal hydroxyl groups such that R₃ is a mixture of hydrogen and alkyl groups.

We have found that both propoxylated oleyl and isostearyl alcohols (when the value of m is 0) and acids (when the value of m is 1) and their end-capped equivalents show no significant surfactant properties. These materials do not contain a hydrophilic moiety and would not be considered to have an HLB classification. Attempts to use these materials to emulsify a simple oil such as decane into water showed that separation into two phases occurred even after vigorous shaking. Where some small amount of emulsification was observed this was found to be short lived. Surprisingly the bioperformance enhancement, in particular for lipophilic agrochemicals, is excellent despite the lack of surfactant properties. Moreover, the absence of surfactant properties may bring a number of advantages such as reduced spray drift, a reduction in adverse interaction with surfactants added for formulation purposes (such as suspension of a dispersed solid) and reduced gelling of the formulation. Moreover the adjuvants are generally liquids (oils) which are substantially insoluble in water and are readily compatible for example with emulsion concentrates in which they dissolve in the oil phase. They are also more readily used as stand-alone tank mix adjuvants since they are oil-soluble. Increasing the molecular weight, for example using butyl end-capping and a value of n towards the upper end of the range, may produce a solid adjuvant which is for example well adapted for incorporation in solid formulations such as water-soluble or water-dispersible granules. In general the propoxylated adjuvants of the present invention are liquid whereas the ethoxylates are either solid or semi-solid. An exception is oleyl 10 EO with a butyl end cap which is a liquid.

We have found similarly that ethoxylated oleyl and isostearyl end-capped methyl and butyl ethers show no significant surfactant properties. They generally have different physical properties from the uncapped equivalents which can be used to advantage. For example oleyl 10 EO end-capped butyl ether is an oily liquid which emulsifies readily in water whilst the uncapped oleyl 10 EO equivalent forms viscous liquid crystals on contact with water. Increasing the molecular weight, for example using butyl end-capping and a value of n towards the upper end of the range, may produce a solid adjuvant which is for example well adapted for incorporation in solid formulations such as water-soluble or water-dispersible granules. Typical of such a solid adjuvant according to the present invention is oleyl 20 EO end-capped with butyl (i.e. the compound in which R₁ is oleyl, R₂ is ethyl, n is 20 and R₃ is butyl).

As specific examples of the adjuvants of the present invention or which may be used in agrochemcial compositions of the present invention there may be mentioned oleyl 10 propylene oxide (i.e. a compound of Formula (1) wherein R1 is oleyl, m is 0, R₂ is isopropylene, n is 10 and R₃ is hydrogen), oleyl 10 propylene oxide end-capped butyl ether (i.e. a compound of Formula (1) wherein R₁ is oleyl, m is 0, R₂ is isopropylene, n is 10 and R₃ is butyl), oleyl 20 propylene oxide, oleyl 20 propylene oxide end-capped butyl ether, isostearyl 10 propylene oxide, isostearyl 20 propylene oxide, oleyl 10 ethylene oxide end-capped butyl ether, oleyl 20 ethylene oxide end-capped butyl ether, oleic acid 10 ethylene oxide end-capped methyl ether (i.e. a compound of Formula (1) wherein R1 is oleyl, m is 1, R₂ is ethylene, n is 10 and R₃ is methyl), oleic acid 20 ethylene oxide end-capped methyl ether.

Adjuvants of the present invention are generally compatible with microencapsulation processes and can be incorporated as bioperformance enhancing adjuvant in a microencapsulated agrochemical formulation without detriment to the microcapsule properties. In contrast conventional ethoxylated alcohol surfactants tend to interfere with interfacial polymerisation wall-forming processes which are key to most conventional microencapsulation processes.

Adjuvants of the present invention have a variety of uses but are particularly suitable for enhancing the bioperformance of lipophilic agrochemicals, including herbicides, fungicides and insecticides. Examples of suitable lypophilic agrochemicals include herbicides such as fluzifop, mesotrione, fomesafen, tralkoxydim, napropamide, amitraz, propanil, cyprodanil, pyrimethanil, dicloran, tecnazene, toclofos methyl, flamprop M, 2,4-D, MCPA, mecoprop, clodinafop-propargyl, cyhalofop-butyl, diclofop methyl, haloxyfop, quizalofop-P, indol-3-ylacetic acid, 1-naphthylacetic acid, isoxaben, tebutam, chlorthal dimethyl, benomyl, benfuresate, dicamba, dichlobenil, benazolin, triazoxide, fluazuron, teflubenzuron, phenmedipham, acetochlor, alachlor, metolachlor, pretilachlor, thenylchlor, alloxydim, butroxydim, clethodim, cyclodim, sethoxydim, tepraloxydim, pendimethalin, dinoterb, bifenox, oxyfluorfen, acifluorfen, fluoroglycofen-ethyl, bromoxynil, ioxynil, imazamethabenz-methyl, imazapyr, imazaquin, imazethapyr, imazapic, imazamox, flumioxazin, flumiclorac-pentyl, picloram, amodosulfuron, chlorsulfuron, nicosulfuron, rimsulfuron, triasulfuron, triallate, pebulate, prosulfocarb, molinate, atrazine, simazine, cyanazine, ametryn, prometryn, terbuthylazine, terbutryn, sulcotrione, isoproturon, linuron, fenuron, chlorotoluron, metoxuron, 8-(2,6-diethyl-4-methyl-phenyl)tetrahydropyrazolo[1,2-d][1,4,5]oxadiazepine-7,9-dione and 2,2,-dimethyl-propionic acid-8-(2,6-diethyl-4-methyl-phenyl)-9-oxo-1,2,4,5-tetrahydro-9H-pyrazolo[1,2-d][1,4,5]oxadiazepine-7-yl ester, fungicides such as azoxystrobin, trifloxystrobin, kresoxim methyl, famoxadone, metominostrobin, picoxystrobin, dimoxystrobin, fluoxastrobin, orysastrobin, metominostrobin, prothioconazole, carbendazim, thiabendazole, dimethomorph, vinclozolin, iprodione, dithiocarbamate, imazalil, prochloraz, fluquinconazole, epoxiconazole, flutriafol, azaconazole, bitertanol, bromuconazole, cyproconazole, difenoconazole, hexaconazole, paclobutrazole, propiconazole, tebuconazole, triadimefon, trtiticonazole, fenpropimorph, tridemorph, fenpropidin, mancozeb, metiram, chlorothalonil, thiram, ziram, captafol, captan, folpet, fluazinam, flutolanil, carboxin, metalaxyl, bupirimate, ethirimol, and insecticides such as thiamethoxam, imidacloprid, acetamiprid, clothianidin, dinotefuran, nitenpyram, fipronil, abamectin, emamectin, bendiocarb, carbaryl, fenoxycarb, isoprocarb, pirimicarb, propoxur, xylylcarb, asulam, chlorpropham, endosulfan, heptachlor, tebufenozide, bensultap, diethofencarb, pirimniphos methyl, aldicarb, methomyl, cyprmethrin, bioallethrin, deltamethrin, lambda cyhalothrin, cyhalothrin, cyfluthrin, fenvalerate, imiprothrin, permetlrin, halfenprox.

Adjuvants of the present invention may be prepared by conventional techniques. Thus for example the ethoxylated or propopoxylated alcohol or acid may be manufactured by base catalysed condensation of the relevant alcohol or acid (for example oleyl or isostearyl alcohol or acid) with ethylene oxide (or propylene oxide as the case may be). End-capped derivatives may be obtained by reacting the ethoxylated or propoxylated alcohol or acid with the appropriate alkyl halide (for example butyl chloride) in the presence of a base.

The proportion of adjuvant relative to active ingredient can readily be selected by one skilled in the art to meet the intended utility. Typically the ratio of adjuvant to active ingredient will range from 1:50 and 200:1 and preferably from 1:5 to 20:1

The invention is illustrated by the following Examples in which all parts and percentages are by weight unless otherwise stated.

EXAMPLES 1 TO 10

Compounds of the present invention or for use in agrochemical compositions of the present invention are characterised as indicated below. In each case NMR spectra were run as 10% v/v solutions in CDCl3 on a Varian Inova 400 spectrometer. A bold and underlined hydrogen indicates the hydrogen responsible for the relevant signal.

Oleyl 10 Propylene Oxide δ5.34 multiplet  2H oleyl 9 & 10CH δ4-3 multiplet 32H oleyl 1CH₂ & propoxyl 1CH₂ & 2CH δ2.01 multiplet  4H oleyl 8 & 11CH₂ δ1.56 multiplet  2H oleyl 2CH₂ δ1.26 mutliplet 22H oleyl 3-7 & 12-17CH₂ δ1.14 multiplet 30H propoxylate 3CH₃ δ0.88 triplet J ≈ 6.9 Hz  3H oleyl 18CH₃

Oleyl 10 Propylene Oxide End-Capped butyl ether δ5.34 multiplet  2H oleyl 9 & 10CH δ4-3 multiplet 34H butyl 1CH₂, oleyl 1CH₂ & propoxyl 1CH₂ & 2CH δ2.02 multiplet  4H oleyl 8 & 11CH₂ δ1.55 multiplet  4H oleyl 2CH₂ & butyl 2CH₂ δ1.35 sextuplet  2H butyl 3CH₂ δ1.26 mutliplet 22H oleyl 3-7 & 12-17CH₂ δ1.14 multiplet 30H propoxylate 3CH₃ δ0.92 triplet J ≈ 7.3 Hz  3H butyl 4CH₃ δ0.88 triplet J ≈ 7.0 Hz  3H oleyl 18CH₃

Oleyl 20 Propylene Oxide δ5.34 multiplet  2H oleyl 9 & 10CH δ4-3 multiplet 62H oleyl 1CH₂ & propoxyl 1CH₂ & 2CH δ2.01 multiplet  4H oleyl 8 & 11CH₂ δ1.56 multiplet  2H oleyl 2CH₂ δ1.26 mutliplet 22H oleyl 3-7 & 12-17CH₂ δ1.14 multiplet 60H propoxylate 3CH₃ δ0.88 triplet J ≈ 6.9 Hz  3H oleyl 18CH₃

Oleyl 20 Propylene Oxide End-Capped butyl ether δ5.34 multiplet  2H oleyl 9 & 10CH δ4-3 multiplet 64H butyl 1CH₂, oleyl 1CH₂ & propoxyl 1CH₂ & 2CH δ2.02 multiplet  4H oleyl 8 & 11CH₂ δ1.55 multiplet  4H oleyl 2CH₂ & butyl 2CH₂ δ1.35 sextuplet  2H butyl 3CH₂ δ1.26 mutliplet 22H oleyl 3-7 & 12-17CH₂ δ1.14 multiplet 60H propoxylate 3CH₃ δ0.92 triplet J ≈ 7.3 Hz  3H butyl 4CH₃ δ0.88 triplet J ≈ 7.0 Hz  3H oleyl 18CH₃

Isostearyl (2-hexyl-dodecan-1-ol) 10 Propylene Oxide δ4-3 multiplet 32H dodecyl 1CH₂ & propoxyl 1CH₂ & 2CH δ1.56 multiplet  2H dodecyl 2CH₂ δ1.26 mutliplet 27H dodecyl 3-11CH₂, 6CH & hexyl 1-5CH₂ δ1.14 multiplet 30H propoxylate 3CH₃ δ0.88 triplet J ≈ 6.9 Hz  3H decyl 12CH₃ & hexyl 6CH₃

Isostearyl (2-hexyl-dodecan-1-ol) 20 Propylene Oxide δ4-3 multiplet 62H dodecyl 1CH₂ & propoxyl 1CH₂ & 2CH δ1.56 multiplet  2H dodecyl 2CH₂ δ1.26 mutliplet 27H dodecyl 3-11CH₂, 6CH & hexyl 1-5CH₂ δ1.14 multiplet 60H propoxylate 3CH₃ δ0.88 triplet J ≈ 6.9 Hz  3H decyl 12CH₃ & hexyl 6CH₃

Oleyl 10 Ethylene Oxide End-Capped Butyl Ether δ5.35 multiplet  2H oleyl 9 & 10CH δ3.65 singlet 32H polyethoxyl mid chain CH₂ δ3.63 multiplet  4H polyethoxyl —OC H ² CH₂OR δ3.58 multiplet  4H polyethoxyl —OCH₂C H ² OR δ3.46 triplet J ≈ 6.5 Hz  2H butyl 1CH₂ δ3.46 triplet J ≈ 6.5 Hz  2H oleyl 1CH₂ δ2.01 multiplet  4H oleyl 8 & 11CH₂ δ1.57 multiplet  4H oleyl 2CH₂ & butyl 2CH₂ δ1.35 sextuplet  2H butyl 3CH₂ δ1.26 mutliplet 22H oleyl 3-7 & 12-17CH₂ δ0.92 triplet J ≈ 7.3 Hz  3H butyl 4CH₃ δ0.88 triplet J ≈ 7.0 Hz  3H oleyl 18CH₃

Oleyl 20 Ethylene Oxide End-Capped Butyl Ether δ5.35 multiplet  2H oleyl 9 & 10CH δ3.65 singlet 72H polyethoxyl mid chain CH₂ δ3.63 multiplet  4H polyethoxyl —OC H ² CH₂OR δ3.58 multiplet  4H polyethoxyl —OCH₂C H ² OR δ3.46 triplet J ≈ 6.5 Hz  2H butyl 1CH₂ δ3.46 triplet J ≈ 6.5 Hz  2H oleyl 1CH₂ δ2.01 multiplet  4H oleyl 8 & 11CH₂ δ1.57 multiplet  4H oleyl 2CH₂ & butyl 2CH₂ δ1.35 sextuplet  2H butyl 3CH₂ δ1.26 mutliplet 22H oleyl 3-7 & 12-17CH₂ δ0.92 triplet J ≈ 7.3 Hz  3H butyl 4CH₃ δ0.88 triplet J ≈ 7.0 Hz  3H oleyl 18CH₃

Oleic Acid 10 Ethylene Oxide End-Capped Methyl Ether δ5.33 multiplet  2H oleoyl 9 & 10CH δ4.22 triplet J ≈ 4.9 Hz  2H polyethoxyl —OCH₂C H ² OC═O δ3.70 triplet J ≈ 4.9 Hz  2H polyethoxyl —OC H ² CH₂OC═O δ3.65 singlet 34H polyethoxyl mid chain CH₂ δ3.55 triplet J ≈ 4.9 Hz  2H polyethoxyl —OCH₂C H ² OCH₃ δ3.38 singlet  2H —OCH₃ δ2.33 triplet J ≈ 7.5 Hz  2H oleoyl 2CH₂ δ2.01 multiplet  4H oleoyl 8 & 11CH₂ δ1.62 multiplet  2H oleyl 3CH₂ δ1.28 mutliplet 20H oleyl 4-7 & 12-17CH₂ δ0.88 triplet J ≈ 7.0 Hz  3H oleyl 18CH₃

Oleic Acid 20 Ethylene Oxide End-Capped Methyl Ether δ5.33 multiplet  2H oleoyl 9 & 10CH δ4.22 triplet J ≈ 4.9 Hz  2H polyethoxyl —OCH₂C H ² OC═O δ3.70 triplet J ≈ 4.9 Hz  2H polyethoxyl —OC H ² CH₂OC═O δ3.65 singlet 74H polyethoxyl mid chain CH₂ δ3.55 triplet J ≈ 4.9 Hz  2H polyethoxyl —OCH₂C H ² OCH₃ δ3.38 singlet  2H —OCH₃ δ2.33 triplet J ≈ 7.5 Hz  2H oleoyl 2CH₂ δ2.01 multiplet  4H oleoyl 8 & 11CH₂ δ1.62 multiplet  2H oleyl 3CH₂ δ1.28 mutliplet 20H oleyl 4-7 & 12-17CH₂ δ0.88 triplet J ≈ 7.0 Hz  3H oleyl 18CH₃

EXAMPLES 11 TO 14

An agrochemical composition was prepared containing 0.2% v/v of an adjuvant in a track sprayer containing fluazifop P butyl emulsified at one of four different concentrations. Weeds which had been grown to the 2.3 leaf stage were sprayed using volumes of 200 l/ha. Each sample was replicated three times. The following weed species were tested:—

-   AVEFA Avena fatua (wild oats) -   LOLRI Lolium rigidum (rye grass) -   TRZAW Triticum aestivum (wheat) -   SETVI Setaria viridis (green foxtails)

Activity was measured 21 days after treatment and was compared with a standard composition containing only fluazifop-p-butyl. The concentration required to provide 90% weed kill was calculated and is given in TABLE 1 below together with the mean ED90 across the species. TABLE 1 ED90 Values (g/ha) for Adjuvants of the Invention with Fluazifop-p-butyl Mean Adjuvant AVEFA LOLRI TRZAW SETVI (g/ha) Oleyl 20E Bu Ether 19.5 27.5 21.4 16.5 21.2 Oleic 10E Me Ether 16.7 34.8 28.4 15.8 23.9 Oleyl 10P Bu Ether 19.8 34.9 29.2 16.7 25.2 Oleyl 20P Bu Ether 23.4 48.6 32.2 19 30.8 No Adjuvant 36.7 81.9 66.6 45.8 57.8

EXAMPLES 15 TO 25

Further adjuvants of the present invention were tested for activity in combination with fluzifop-p-butyl. Activity (% weed kill) was measured 21 days after treatment and is given as a mean of 3 replicates and 4 rates of fluazifop-p-butyl. All adjuvants were applied at 0.2% v/v. The results are given in Table 2 in comparison with a corresponding composition containing no adjuvant. TABLE 2 Mean Activity (%) Mean over all Adjuvant TRZAW SETVI LOLRI AVEFA species No adjuvant 19.3 58.2 37.1 62.4 44 Isostearyl 20 PO 37.3 80.9 52.5 58 57 Oleyl 20 PO Bu ether 38.8 75.9 46 67.4 57 Oleyl 20 PO 53.3 80.4 36.3 70.6 60 Oleyl 20 EO Me ether 52.1 74.6 54.9 72.3 63 Isostearyl 10 PO 53.8 81.8 51.8 67.8 64 Oleyl 10 PO Bu ether 45.8 84.2 54.4 71.4 64 Oleyl 10 EO Me ether 56.1 78.4 56.2 71.3 66 Oleyl 10PO 54.3 84.6 55.9 72.6 67 Oleyl 10 EO Bu ether 56 85.6 56.5 73.3 68 Oleyl 20 EO Bu ether 59.3 78.1 68.8 76.1 71

EXAMPLES 26 AND 27

The indicated adjuvants were evaluated in combination with a thin leaved grass herbicide 2,2,-dimethyl-propionic acid-8-(2,6-diethyl-4-methyl-phenyl)-9-oxo-1,2,4,5-tetrahydro-9H-pyrazolo[1,2-d][1,4,5]oxadiazepine-7-yl ester. The weeds were sprayed at the growth stages shown in the table with pesticide emulsions using a track sprayer and volumes of 200 l/ha. The adjuvants were added at 5% v/v as tank mix additives. Each result is the average of two replicates. Rate Mean All Treatment gai/ha ALOMY APESV AVEFA LOLMU PHAPA Weeds No Adjuvant 5 5 5 0 0 0 2 7.5 13 5 0 0 5 5 10 23 3 0 25 3 11 0.5% Oleyl 5 55 23 70 33 23 41 10PO 7.5 70 89 96 60 98 83 10 92 98 98 80 99 93 0.5% Oleyl 5 53 53 89 91 93 76 10EO butyl 7.5 75 97 98 98 96 93 capped 10 88 98 99 93 99 95 APESV (Apera Spica-Venti) PHAPA (Phalaris paradoxa)

EXAMPLE 28

This example demonstrates the improvement in the biological activity of the fungicide azoxystrobin when applied with one of the novel adjuvants in glasshouse tests. The results quoted are the mean percentage disease control from four replicates on barley inoculated with Puccinia recondita. Azoxystrobin was applied from the commercial formulation Quadris 25 SC which was diluted to the strengths shown in the table. The adjuvant was added as a 0.5% v/v tank mix. Azoxystrobin mgai/l No adjuvant control Oleyl 20E Butyl capped 2.5 10.5 90.5 1.25 1.8 82.7 0.625 2.3 66.5 0 0 5.9 

1. An adjuvant having the formula (I) R₁—(CO)_(m)—O—[—R₂O—]_(n)—R₃  (I) wherein R₁ is a C₁₆ to C₂₀ straight or branched chain alkyl or alkenyl group, R₂ is ethyl or isopropyl, n is from 8 to 30 and m is 0 or 1 and when R₂ is ethyl, R₃ is a C₁ to C₇ alkyl group and when R₂ is isopropyl, R₃ is hydrogen or a C₁ to C₇ alkyl group, provided that when R₁ is oleyl, R₂ is isopropyl and R₃ is hydrogen, n is not
 10. 2. An adjuvant according to claim 1 wherein R₁ is an alkenyl group having from 1 to 3 double bonds.
 3. An adjuvant according to claim 1 wherein R₁ is a C₁₈ branched chain alkyl or C₁₈ alkenyl group.
 4. An adjuvant according to claim 3 wherein R₁ is oleyl or isostearyl
 5. An adjuvant according to claim 1 wherein m is
 0. 6. An adjuvant according to claim 1 wherein n is from 10 to
 20. 7. An adjuvant according to claim 1 wherein when R₂ is not hydrogen it is methyl or butyl.
 8. Oleyl 10 propylene oxide end-capped butyl ether, oleyl 20 propylene oxide, oleyl 20 propylene oxide end-capped butyl ether, isostearyl 10 propylene oxide, isostearyl 20 propylene oxide, oleyl 10 ethylene oxide end-capped butyl ether, oleyl 20 ethylene oxide end-capped butyl ether, oleic acid 10 ethylene oxide end-capped methyl ether, and oleic acid 20 ethylene oxide end-capped methyl ether.
 9. An agrochemical composition comprising an adjuvant according to claim
 8. 10. An agrochemical composition comprising a herbicide or fungicide and an adjuvant having the formula (I) R₁—(CO)_(m)—O—[—R₂O—]_(n)—R₃  (I) wherein R₁ is a C₁₆ to C₂₀ straight or branched chain alkyl or alkenyl group, R₂ is ethyl or isopropyl, n is from 8 to 30 and m is 0 or 1 and when R₂ is ethyl, R₃ is a C₁ to C₇ alkyl group and when R₂ is isopropyl, R₃ is hydrogen or a C₁ to C₇ alkyl group.
 11. An agrochemical composition according to claim 10 being encapsulated in a microcapsule.
 12. An agrochemical composition according to claim 10 wherein the agrochemical is fluazifop-p-butyl, azoxystrobin or 2,2,-dimethyl-propionic acid-8-(2,6-diethyl-4-methyl-phenyl)-9-oxo-1,2,4,5-tetrahydro-9H-pyrazolo[1,2-d][1,4,5]oxadiazepine-7-yl ester. 